COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BIOGAS PRODUCTION BOTH FROM PLANTAIN PEELS AND ROTTEN ONION BLENDED WITH POULTRY DROPPINGS
Keywords:plantain peels, poultry droppings
A comparative study was carried out on biogas production potential of plantain peels and rotten onion blended with poultry droppings. Three digesters labeled A, B and C were fabricated with Digester A fed with a mixture of rotten onion and poultry droppings (OP) in a ratio 1:1, Digester B fed with a mixture of plantain peels and poultry droppings (PP) also in the same ratio but Digester C fed in a ratio 1:2:1 of rotten onion, plantain peels and poultry droppings (OPP). The rate of production over a retention period of 40 days was measured using a digital weighing balance to measure the weight of gas retained in each of the circular rubber tube connected to each digester. The effect of the variation in average daily temperature on biogas yield of each feedstock was also analyzed. The co-digestion of rotten onion, plantain peels and poultry droppings yielded most with value of 705.5 g compared to either of plantain peels and rotten onion blended with poultry droppings which has cumulative gas yield of 348.1 g and 199.9 g respectively. It can be concluded that the blending of poultry droppings with agricultural wastes will greatly improve biogas yield.
Ajiboye, A. V., Lasisi, K. H. and Babatola, J. O. (2018). Evaluation of the effect of sodium hydroxide solution on biogas yield of anaerobic digestion of poultry waste and the digestate, Int J Energ Water Res, 2(1-4): 23-31. http://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-018-0003-2.
American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005), American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st Edition.
CarrÃ¨re (2010). Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: A review, Journal of hazardous materials, 183(1), 1-15.
Egun, N. (2012). The Waste to Wealth Concept: Waste Market Operation in Delta State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 2(6), 206-212.
Esposito, G., Frunzo, L., Liotta, F., Panico, A. and Pirozzi, F. (2012). BMP Tests to Measure the Biogas Production from the Digestion and Co-Digestion of Complex Organic Substrates. Open Journal of Environmental Engineering, 5: 1–8.
Grisel, C., Laura P., Umapada P., Fortino B. and Minerva, R. (2013). Generation of Biogas from Coffee-Pulp and Cow-Dung Co-Digestion: Infrared Studies of Post-combustion Emissions. Energy Conversion and Management, 74:471-481.
Idah, P, Ajisegiri, E, and Yisa, M. (2007) 'Fruits and Vegetables Handling and Transportation in Nigeria', Assumption University Journal of Technology, 10(3), 175-183.
Information and Advisory Service on Appropriate Technology (2015). Biogas Digest. UtzDornberger, Eschborn, Germany.
Jungbluth N., Chudacoff M., Dauriat A., Dinkel F., Doka G., FaistEmmenegger M., Gnansounou E., Kljun N., Schleiss K., Spielmann M., Stettler C. and Sutter J. (2007). Life Cycle Inventories of Bioenergy. ecoinvent report No.17, v2.0. Retrieved from: https://www.ecoinvent.org.
Li, Y., Park, S.Y. and Zhu, J. (2011). Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion for Methane Production from Organic Waste. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 15 (1): 821-826.
Peter, J. J. (2009). PlanEnergi and Researcher for a Day. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University 2nd edition.
Wang, X., Yang, G., Li, F., Feng, Y. and Ren, G. (2013). Response surface optimization of methane potentials in anaerobic co-digestion of multiple substrates: dairy, chicken manure and wheat. Waste Manage. Res. 31: 60–66.
Copyright (c) 2022 FUTA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
With the submission of a manuscript, the corresponding author confirms that the manuscript is not under consideration by another journal. With the acceptance of a manuscript, the Journal reserves the exclusive right of publication and dissemination of the information contained in the article. The veracity of the paper and all the claims therein is solely the opinion of the authors not the journal.