Assessment of Cost Effectiveness of Borehole Drilling in Oyo State, Nigeria
Keywords:Building projects, risk identification, risk response, Rivers State, Performance
This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of borehole drilling in Nigeria using Oyo State as a case study. Fifteen (15) borehole drilling companies designated A to O were examined in the study area. Data collected using questionnaires covers the cost items estimated in industrial and domestic borehole drilling. Regression analysis was carried out to and the significant cost effectiveness of industrial borehole drilling in the study area. Number of skilled labour, number of unskilled labour, number of drilling rig, number of terrameter, frequency of maintenance, number of casing, drilling equipment, submersible pump, water analysis/treatment, casing type, site accessibility and skills availability among others were discovered insignificant determinants of cost effectiveness of industrial borehole drilling in the study area at 5% level, (p > 0.05). It is also noted that these factors do not have a combined significant effect on the cost effectiveness of industrial borehole drilling (F = 8.138, p = 0.114) and determine 86.0% changes in cost effectiveness of industrial borehole drilling in the study area (Adj. R2 = 86.0%), while these variables determine 94.8% changes in cost effectiveness in domestic borehole drilling (Adj. R2 = 94.8%). The result of the t â€“ test of comparison of mean difference between the mean cost of drilling a domestic and industrial boreholes revealed a significant mean difference between costs of producing a domestic borehole (323,333.33 Naira) and industrial boreholes (530,000 Naira). This difference was found to be significant at 5% level, (t = -11.808, p = 0.000). It is concluded that borehole drilling be cost effective while quality is not compromise thereby giving due value for investment.
Adekile, D and Olabode O. (2008). Study of Study of Public and Private Borehole Drilling in Nigeria. Consultancy Report for UNICEF Nigeria Wash Section. Available from:http://www.rwsn.ch/documentation/skatdocument ation.2009 assessed on 12th January, 2014
Levin, H. M., and McEwan, P. J. (2001). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp 301 â€“ 303
Peter B. (2005). Drilling Wells. Series of Manuals on Drinking Water Supply. SKAT, Swiss Centre for Development Cooperation in Technology and Management. ISBN: 3-908001-98-6 Volume 6. Pp 15-32
Shiklimanov I.A. (2002). Hydrological Cycle. World Water Balance and Water Resources of the Earth. UNESCO. http://webworld.unesco.org/water/ihp/db/shiklomanov/summary/html/summary.html assessed on 12th January, 2014
WHO/UNICEF 2010. World Health Organisation (WHO) Report Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water: 2010 Update assessed on 12th February, 2014
With the submission of a manuscript, the corresponding author confirms that the manuscript is not under consideration by another journal. With the acceptance of a manuscript, the Journal reserves the exclusive right of publication and dissemination of the information contained in the article. The veracity of the paper and all the claims therein is solely the opinion of the authors not the journal.